Act Out 2

Truth Rises Podcast

Act Out 2

0:00

-1:53

Act Out 2

& Lean in too.

Emily Peyton -Truth Rises

Jul 18, 2025

Transcript

Yesterday the Genius act was passed, clearly the lot of them believed it to be genius to tuck in that act the following:

(iv)technical capabilities, policies and procedures to block, freeze and reject specific or impermissible transactions that violate federal or state laws, rules or regulations.

The Prez says: get it to my desk!

The long and short of it, words matter. For the Prez to say we will not have central bad or federal reserve CBDCs, may actually mean we will have stable coin cbdc, not administered by the bank but the most giant corporation. He left that part out. Look closely at the language of iv up there:

Technical capabilities, policies and procedures to block, reject specific or impermissible transactions

“Reject specific”? Without due process, without charge, without parameters? You didn’t show up for your annual shots, you didn’t bring your kid to the trans program, you bought heirloom seeds and dirt, in other words anything specific they want to target. Never mind the drones and (self-, or not) driving cars. They have it all ready to roll out.

This is also ‘genius’, from the act: “-that violate federal or state laws, rules or regulations”- Who makes rules? Who makes regulations? Unelected bureaucrats. The Congress has been- but lawfully cannot- redelegate its authority.

This means that now that you have been conditioned to ‘be approved’ when you use your plastic card for transactions (who approves, the bank(?), why its god! being equivocated with the Bank). The correct universal language, accurate language, would have been, payment Cleared! They didn’t use “Cleared” absolutely because “approved” sets the stage for-disapproved.

Now, the ending or pulling of cash options in commerce, for conservative reasons: “its a fraud debt instrument anyways”, for liberal reasons, “we can catch the baddies” The Fed must be ended. Genius! Then without a shred of evidentiary process, or accusation, the crypto surveillance grid is here, for all tyranny to come.

You say, or act or embody a non conforming thought or criticism, your real id stops you, your (crypto now) cards disapprove you, your payment stops from your job, your SS, your anywhere “your” money is removed, just as if a little back door is in the cupboard of your bank stash, and a gloved hand reaches in from behind the wall, through that hand door, and takes what it wants. Cash is no longer.

SO yes use more cash now. This is not the whole solution but it is a slow down while we reorganize.

The “Genius Act” is critical tyranny. These people dare authority we shall be removing from them.

We do that with our own words.

We do that by using the words of those who know how to arrange them as undoing spells. Words arranged are manifesting ‘spells’, OHM perhaps is the most omnipotent of all.

MTJ appears to be the champion of our liberties. However, by identifying the central bank, rather than any programmable currencies delivered from any corporate center, she leaves the back door wide open for the path I just described, take down of the Fed, make unlawful the Dollar system and with it cash, and replace it by stable coin not administered by any “bank”.

Remember, control is what they want. CONTROL of all is their game.

“Americans do not want a government-controlled Central Bank Digital Currency,” Greene said on X.

“Republicans have a duty to ban CBDC. President Trump included a ban on CBDC in his January 23rd executive order and Congress must also include the ban on CBDC in the GENIUS Act.”

Speaking to reporters on July 17, ahead of the vote, Greene said it would be a challenge to pass a ban on CBDCs in the upper chamber.

The question is, are we going to prevent them, and how? What will we do instead?

Start letting them know, that we know they are violating.

Here is a Notice you can copy and send.

Begin doing it, by snail mail or by email or by social media post we need lots of us to let them know, share these below- so they know we know they are out beyond their skiis, outside of their limits of power, or authority that we delegate to them. With this process they know that we can pursue them. We will have the ammunition to undo their tyranny without a shot fired.

Go to Ron Bouchard’s website to send more at www.wethepeople2.us. He makes it easy.

Here’s the Notice, followed by the affidavit.

NOTICE OF PROHIBITION AGAINST PRESUMPTION OF ILLEGALITY AND DEMAND FOR DUE PROCESS

To: All United States Public Officials, Federal and State Financial Regulators, and Technology Contractors
From: [Your Full Name / Entity Name]
Date: [Insert Date]
Subject: Notice to Cease Presumption of Illegality Without Due Process & Unlawful Enforcement of Transactional Censorship
Delivery Method: [Certified Mail / Email / Personal Service / Public Notice]

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL. NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT.

I, [Full Name], a living [man/woman], hereby issue this lawful Notice and Demand, invoking my unalienable rights secured under the Constitution for the United States and all applicable state constitutions.

I. DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

No government or delegated authority may presume a financial transaction to be “impermissible” or “unlawful” without substantiated due process, including formal accusation, full disclosure of evidence, opportunity to respond, and adjudication by an impartial tribunal or jury.
The right to engage in commerce and exchange is protected by natural law and by the constitutional guarantees of liberty, property, and due process (U.S. Const. Amend. V, XIV).
Any technological system—such as a stablecoin or programmable digital currency—that is granted the capability to block, freeze, or reject lawful transactions prior to adjudication or proof of illegality violates these rights and constitutes preemptive punishment without process.
Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution prohibits bills of attainder—laws that impose punishment without trial. Any system that enforces such punishment via automated or discretionary “freeze” or “block” functions, without lawful judgment, is constitutionally repugnant.
The GENIUS Act’s provision enabling the blocking of “specific or impermissible transactions that violate federal or state laws, rules or regulations” grants unlawful pre-judgmental powers to unelected actors and algorithms, denying the accused any opportunity to be heard.

II. NOTICE OF PROHIBITION

Accordingly, let it be known that:

You are prohibited from presuming any financial exchange, barter, or transaction to be illegal without:

Lawful accusation grounded in specific fact;
A meaningful opportunity to contest said accusation;
Due process of law under Article III judicial standards or equivalent constitutional state process;
Final judgment of illegality rendered by an impartial court or jury of peers.

Any system, act, policy, or technological implementation that enforces financial punishment or exclusion prior to such process is in violation of both the U.S. Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 10, 11).

You are further prohibited from developing, deploying, or enforcing:

Programmable currency systems that deny commerce by presumption;
Surveillance tools that flag or label transactions as “impermissible” without due process;
Freezing or blacklisting capabilities without lawful trial and conviction.

III. DEMAND FOR CURE

You are hereby given fifteen (15) days to respond in kind, with:

A notarized affidavit affirming that you and your agency recognize the constitutional limits to your authority;
A copy of your office’s procedures ensuring that no transaction is blocked, frozen, or rejected without due process;
The name and public oath of office of the responsible parties enforcing or supporting such technology.

Failure to respond constitutes tacit admission of your intent to violate constitutionally protected rights and to participate in a scheme of preemptive punishment and digital despotism.

IV. LAWFUL CONSEQUENCES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE

This Notice is entered into the public record and shall be used as evidence of willful and knowing disregard of the Constitution, with potential consequences including:

Legal and equitable remedy;
Claims of damages and deprivation under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and related statutes;
Public exposure, lawful liens, and private enforcement actions under Natural Law and Common Law jurisdiction.

Signed,
[Your Full Legal Name]
[Your Mailing Address]
[Your Contact Info]

If you have gone to the length of mailing a certified copy, keep the green card, and then send the following as an Affidavit when the time frame has elapsed:

AFFIDAVIT OF FACT AND NOTICE OF PROHIBITION AGAINST PREEMPTIVE RESTRICTION OF COMMERCE
Concerning the GENIUS Act and all programmable monetary instruments

To:
The President of the United States
Members of the United States Congress
The United States Department of the Treasury

From:
[Your Full Name]
[Your Address or Private Location]
Date: [Insert Date]

I, [Full Name], a living [man/woman] created by God, competent to testify to the facts herein, being of sound mind and under no duress, do affirm the following to be true, correct, and based on firsthand knowledge:

I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

I issue this sworn Affidavit to provide lawful Notice and to assert prohibition against any federal, state, or private actor implementing or enforcing any system of programmable digital currency or monetary framework that restricts my right to engage in peaceful commerce absent due process of law.
This Affidavit addresses provisions such as those recently included in the GENIUS Act, particularly language authorizing “technical capabilities, policies and procedures to block, freeze and reject specific or impermissible transactions that violate federal or state laws, rules or regulations.”
Such provisions violate the United States Constitution, including but not limited to:
- Amendment V: No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
- Amendment XIV, Section 1: Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process.
- Article I, Section 9, Clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

II. AFFIRMATION OF FACTS

As a private person with unalienable rights, I assert that the right to trade, barter, exchange, or transact is a natural and lawful extension of my liberty and property.
I have not committed any crime, nor have I been lawfully accused or convicted of any activity that would warrant restriction of my commercial capacity.
No person, agency, or automated system has lawful authority to block or freeze my lawful financial activity based on presumption, algorithmic detection, regulatory discretion, or suspicion alone.
To restrict my transactions without notice, charge, hearing, and lawful judgment is to impose punishment without trial—a direct violation of the Bill of Rights.
Programmable currencies with embedded censorship capabilities pose an existential threat to liberty and open the door to financial control by central authority without judicial oversight, which is incompatible with a constitutional republic.

III. NOTICE AND PROHIBITION

Let it be known to all recipients of this Affidavit that:

Any implementation or support of transactional controls that function as automated punishment, denial of service, or restriction of economic participation—prior to a lawful finding of wrongdoing—is hereby prohibited.
I do not consent and never will consent to any form of currency, platform, or payment infrastructure that contains programmable restrictions that may block, surveil, freeze, or reverse transactions absent my free will and due process protection.
Any system which does so is hereby declared, by this Notice and Affidavit, to be fraudulent, treasonous, and a violation of the public trust.

IV. DEMAND FOR RESPONSE

I demand that each recipient of this Affidavit and Notice respond within fifteen (15) days of receipt with:

a. A notarized statement affirming that no person shall be denied financial services or access to exchange without due process;
b. Disclosure of any system under your agency’s jurisdiction or proposal that enables programmable restrictions on lawful transactions;
c. Rejection of any provision—such as those in the GENIUS Act—that violate the due process rights of the people.

V. CONSEQUENCES OF NON-RESPONSE

Failure to respond in the time stated shall be taken as tacit agreement and admission of liability, and you will be held personally and professionally accountable for violations of my rights, both now and in the future.
A copy of this Affidavit may be made public, recorded, and used as evidence in any proceeding, investigation, or lawful claim to seek remedy.

VI. FINAL AFFIRMATION

I affirm that the statements herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief, and understanding. I affirm that all lawful authority flows from the people, not from corporate, legislative, or algorithmic entities acting in secret.

Executed on this day: [Insert Date]
By:

Witness:

(Signature)
Date: ___________

Notary (if desired):
[Space for Notarial Acknowledgment]

You can send it with the following cover letter:

Office of thePresident of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Secretary of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20220

All Members of the 118th United States Congress
United States Capitol
Washington, DC 20510

Subject: Formal Affidavit and Notice of Constitutional Prohibition Against Preemptive Restriction of Lawful Commerce via Stablecoin Infrastructure or GENIUS Act Authority

Dear Public Servants,

I am writing to deliver the enclosed Affidavit of Fact and Notice of Prohibition, which I have sworn under penalty of perjury and the authority vested in me as a private living woman/man with unalienable rights.

The affidavit specifically addresses provisions within the recently passed GENIUS Act, which include language allowing the development of technical and policy-based mechanisms to “block, freeze, and reject specific or impermissible transactions.” Such presumptive restrictions—deployed in the name of state or federal compliance but without formal due process—are unconstitutional, unlawful, and morally unacceptable.

The right to engage in peaceful commerce cannot be infringed by bureaucratic discretion, code, or programmable fiat proxies. Commerce must not become a privilege doled out only to the compliant. The Constitution demands that no person be deprived of liberty or property without due process of law.

I demand that you uphold your oath to defend the Constitution, and immediately take action to repeal, rescind, or prohibit any enforcement or funding of programs that violate this core principle.

The enclosed affidavit serves as formal notice and lawful demand, and I require a written response within fifteen (15) days of your receipt. Failure to respond shall constitute tacit agreement and will be entered into the public record as evidence of willful disregard for constitutional governance.

With respect and resolve,
[Signature (if printed)]

Lastly something to remind you of what we Living expressions of God ourselves can accomplish, in case you felt trapped: One legged Man Builds Tree House