As too many people believe, 2020 election results were duly examined by juries and discharged by over 200 courts presided by judges. The fact is that all, yes ALL of the cases were dismissed for ‘lack of standing’. I want to argue that judges themselves do not have the right to declare lack of or establishment of standing.
They may declare a frivolous suit, or one of double jeopardy. However, judges may not, I believe, declare lack of standing and obey the Constitution they pledge an oath to uphold.
Certainly, one has to navigate a legal system that has gone far astray into Maritime jurisdiction, admiralty law of the UCC, universal commercial code. One has to specifically inquire with each judge, do you intend in this matter to honor your oath to the Constitution? And do you intend to honor my constitutional rights as directed by your oath and instructed by the Constitution?
If one does not redirect the judge to the common law basis of the land based jurisdiction, then the judge is administering maritime law, and that law does not recognize the Constitution, it is the law of the seas practiced in Courts, where our Constitution does not hold sway.
So there are two issues. If the judge is not instructed to operate in a jurisdiction that honors the constitution, he/she will be allowed to dismiss any case for lack of standing because Amendment VII states: In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Common Law is the law of the land. Common Law is the law of the Constitution. Admiralty law is the law of corporations, it is the law of contracts and the law of (maritime) the seas.
I’ll bet that all the lawyers, even good ones, not unlike well intentioned doctors giving the first half dozen 10 day course of Remdesivir (thereafter once losing all 6 patients to kidney failure by day 9, then they become liable for continuing to use it no matter what the hospital or the FDA tells them), are operating in the admiralty. That is the Bar’s speciality. It is their allegiance. The idea that we, the people, are chatel, and offered a mini corporation for use by the universal commercial code to trade our life energy with, is not a conspiracy, it is a proven problem.
Our ignorance and obedience is the compelling factor. The hiding in plain site name game, wherein the all caps name EMILY PEYTON, is the name of the corporation, and the Emily Peyton is the name of the soul, and the spirit that embodies me is simply I AM, is not taught in law school or any schools. It is that spirit that is of God that has the rights described in the Constitution and additional rights that are NOT even named in the Constitution. Therefore we have rights wherever the Constitution fails to enumerate them.
However, because we are spiritual beings and we have a universal interconnection, doing onto one means doing onto ourselves, thus, our rights duly utilized as manifestations of peace and protection of peace must additionally obey the do no harm axiom. Do no harm is not the same as Do Unto Others as You Would Have Others Do Unto You, simply because of mental psychosis, cultural quirks, affinity for perversions. In benign terms, just because you may love to hug everyone and you may know that hugging is excellent for endorphins, does not follow that everyone you meet should be automatically hugged. That would be a trespass for many, and thus, you must apply the Golden Rule with the Do No Harm. It’s a combo.
While forgiveness of harm is honored where aggressors seek to remove your right to have a 3d experience, if one aggresses against another life form without using peaceful means at ones disposal to prevent harm, then one brings that same harm upon oneself as a magnetic rule of the universe. You may throw a pie, and recieve egg in the face, literally or figuratively, nonetheless, it’s a magnetic thing.
Back to Standing.
I want to challenge the Courts rights to operate in admiralty without due notice to the participants. I don’t think I am up to it. Frankly I have so much to do to bring forward the way for We the People to manage our own money supply, through the Alliance Marketspace, and I am a little impatient with God, since I do need Source’s timetable to agree with my own sense of urgency, however, it appears to me to be also a matter of informed consent. I’ll explore it more and continue with improving my Notice of Information, to precede Notices of Liability. At the WethePeople site they are developing a place where we can create and send notices easily. I like their work.
I spent last night with the Tactical Civics groups seeking to help people reorganize to uphold their responsibility to direct public servants. They have a meeting tonight.
Tomorrow night is the Common Law academy at 7 pm, and www.wethepeople2.us is the site where notices are available to refute the emergency powers as an underminer of constitutional rights and another is there to refute Kamala’s constitutionality as a candidate.
Be certain to watch this video will you? Everyone needs this information. The remedy to much of the deliberate poisoning, is Nicotine? And Nicotene is not the addictive agent? Pyrazines are?1
Thanks for thinking with me.
Pyrazines are an important class of these additives, and their presence in tobacco cigarettes has been correlated with increased acceptability of smoking among smokers and bystanders. Pyrazine use by the tobacco industry is therefore thought to encourage smoking.
You are brilliant when it comes down to law-related. Thank-you for this :)